BTO announces senior promotions across the firm
BTO Solicitors LLP is delighted to announce a series of senior promotions across the firm, recognising the contribution and expertise of its people. The promotions take effect from 1 April…
READ MORE
But while founders focus on technology, investment, and commercial roll‑out, governance documents and equity records can easily fall to the bottom of the priority list. When these aren’t properly maintained, the consequences can be disruptive, costly, and in some cases, legally problematic.
This blog highlights key governance considerations for STEM companies, including the importance of well‑drafted Articles of Association and Shareholders’ Agreements, common pitfalls we see in practice, and why accurate cap table management is fundamental to growth.
The Articles of Association (the Articles) are the company’s constitutional rules. They govern how decisions are made, the rights attached to different share classes, how directors are appointed or removed, and the process for issuing and transferring shares. They also interact with—and sometimes override—default company law provisions.
For STEM companies, where ownership structures can evolve quickly and investor expectations are more sophisticated, robust and tailored Articles are essential.
Common pitfalls include: out‑of‑date Articles after investment rounds, inconsistencies with the Shareholders’ Agreement, and insufficient authority to allot shares for future hires or funding rounds.
The Shareholders’ Agreement governs relationships between shareholders. It commonly includes investor protections, reserved matters, information rights, restrictions on share transfers, and dispute‑resolution mechanisms. Unlike the Articles, the Shareholders’ Agreement is a private agreement and is not filed on the public register at Companies House.
STEM businesses often involve multiple founders, early‑stage investors, technical specialists, and sometimes university or research‑institute stakeholders. A well‑constructed Shareholders’ Agreement provides stability and clarity.
Common pitfalls include outdated reserved matters, unsuitable deadlock provisions, new shareholders not added as parties, and conflicts with the Articles.
One of the most common issues we see with early stage STEM businesses is the absence of a properly maintained register of members – or, the absence of a register of members at all.
Every company must maintain an up‑to‑date register of its shareholders. The register—not Companies House—legally determines who owns the shares. A share transfer or allotment is not legally effective until the register is updated.
Failing to create the register at incorporation is common. Rectifying this later can delay investment and cause disputes.
A cap table tracks ownership and must remain consistent with the statutory registers. For STEM companies with option schemes and frequent funding rounds, accuracy is essential. Founders also need to look to the future when considering issuing shares or granting share options, to ensure they understand the dilutive effect down the line.
We would recommend carrying out a governance review, at least annually, to:
Stay informed