Data protection watchdog still has bite
Many will remember the sense of trepidation in the air when GDPR came into effect, with the Information Commissioner’s Office given powers to impose fines for breaches of GDPR of…
READ MOREWe use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.
The cookies that are categorised as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ...
Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.
Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyse the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customised advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyse the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.
The management of deer in Scotland is governed by the Deer (Scotland) Act 1996. The Bill introduces extensive amendments to the 1996 Act.
If the draft legislation becomes law, owners and occupiers of a particular area of land will be required to prepare and implement a Deer Management Plan (“DMP”). The process will be initiated by NatureScot serving a notice on relevant owners and occupiers requiring them to submit a DMP, containing reasons why NatureScot is satisfied a DMP is required. The DMP must be approved by NatureScot.
A DMP outlines the strategies for sustainable deer management to prevent damage to public interests such as natural habitats and public safety. It must set out the measures that owners and occupiers will take, the time limit for taking those measures, who is to take the measures and any other matters that appear to be necessary. The Bill introduces a new ground as the basis for NatureScot requiring owners or occupiers of an area of land to prepare and implement a DMP where insufficient deer management is impeding projects or natural processes that serve to improve or restore the natural environment.
In addition, NatureScot is to draft a control agreement. A control agreement is a voluntary arrangement between NatureScot and landowners or occupiers. The agreement specifies the following:
The measures aim to prevent damage to agriculture, the national heritage and the woodlands, and to mitigate risks to public safety. Where NatureScot forms a view, having regard to the nature and character of the particular area of land, that measure should be taken, it is required to provide the relevant owners and occupiers with notice of the control agreement. NatureScot then drafts the control agreement.
Amendments have also been made to the control scheme. Control schemes are statutory measures, where control agreements are not feasible or where compliance with a control agreement has been inadequate. NatureScot can serve a notice proposing to make, vary or revoke a control scheme. Objections are to be made to the Scottish Ministers within a period of 28 days beginning with the date of service of the notice. Only those part of the control scheme can object to the proposals or any part of the scheme. The Scottish Ministers will consider any objections, and either confirm the proposal as originally proposed, confirm with modifications or reject the proposal. A relevant person aggrieved by the decision to confirm the making, variation or revocation of a control scheme can appeal.
The Bill also introduces amendments to existing powers that allow NatureScot to intervene in instances where deer are deemed to impact nature restoration activities.
“(a) Intervention is permitted, if the deer management within a particular area (or if there is no management in place) has caused or is likely to cause the following:
(i) Damage to woodland, to agricultural protection, including any crops or foodstuffs, to the welfare of deer, whether directly or indirectly, to the natural heritage or environment generally;
(ii) Damage to public interests of a social, economic or environmental nature; or
(iii) Injury to livestock, whether by serious overgrazing of pastures, competing with any such livestock for supplementary feeding, or otherwise, or
(b) deer have become a danger or potential danger to public safety.”
NatureScot can also intervene where deer are likely to prevent or reduce the effectiveness of a project, work or natural process that:
“(a) preserves, protects, restores enhances or otherwise improves the natural heritage or environment; and
(b) is for, or contributes to, a relevant target, strategy or plan relating to the environment, climate change or biodiversity that applies in Scotland.”
The Bill contains several new offences:
We will track the Bill as it progresses through the Scottish Parliament. At this stage, it is clear that the legislation, once it comes into force, will have a significant impact on the way in which deer are managed and controlled by the Scottish rural sector.
We are seeing significant legal developments impacting the rural sector. The Wildlife Management and Muirburn (Scotland) Act 2024 is a recent example. The Bill is a continuation of the trend of increasing regulatory demands on organisations operating in the sector. Please get in touch if you have any questions on these recent developments.
Notifications