bto solicitors - Corporate & Commercial Business Lawyers Glasgow Edinburgh Scotland

  • "really fights your corner..."
    "really fights your corner..." Chambers UK
  • "Consistently high-quality work and client-friendly approach."
    "Consistently high-quality work and client-friendly approach." Chambers UK
  • "really adaptable and innovative approach"
    "really adaptable and innovative approach" Chambers UK
  • "technical mastery (and) commercial realism ...differentiate bto from the competition.”
    "technical mastery (and) commercial realism ...differentiate bto from the competition.” Longstanding bto client
  • "The culture in the firm is second to none and all the solicitors have the highest regard for client service.”
    "The culture in the firm is second to none and all the solicitors have the highest regard for client service.” Legal 500
  • "highly experienced and knowledgeable"
    "highly experienced and knowledgeable" Legal 500
  • "professional and confidence-inspiring."
    "professional and confidence-inspiring." Legal 500
  • "Meticulous, calm and authoritative"
    "Meticulous, calm and authoritative" Chambers UK
  • "prompt, efficient and courteous service"
    "prompt, efficient and courteous service" Legal 500
  • "excellent blend of experience, technical nous and commercial sense"
    "excellent blend of experience, technical nous and commercial sense" Legal 500
  • "thorough and logical thinking"
    "thorough and logical thinking" Chambers UK
  • "superb" "fantastic grasp of detail"
    "superb" "fantastic grasp of detail" Chambers UK

Sheriff Principal upholds decision to award tenant 3 x deposit (£2,250)

30 January 2015

Appeal by landlords against Sheriff Court Decision in favour of a tenant as a result of the landlords’ failure to comply with the Tenancy Deposit (Scotland) Regulations 2011.

Mr Russell and Ms Clark, as landlords of a property at 4/6 Admiralty Street, Edinburgh appealed against the Sheriff’s decision to award a sum in favour of their tenant amounting to 3x the tenancy deposit of £750 due to their failure to comply with regulation 3 of the Tenancy Deposit (Scotland) Regulations 2011. The landlords had failed to pay the tenant’s deposit of £750 into one of the three approved tenancy deposit schemes and subsequently made deductions from the deposit before returning the balance to the tenant at the expiry of the lease. The Sheriff Principal upheld the Sheriff’s decision to award the sum of £2,250 to the tenant, holding that the landlord had a clear duty to protect the tenant’s deposit and had failed to do so.

The duty to lodge a deposit with one of the approved schemes is absolute and there is no defence to a court action for payment under the Regulation if the deposit has not been properly lodged. It appears that the court can take into account circumstances when fixing the sum to be awarded but so far in such cases the courts have been awarding the maximum amount. We are aware of at least one claims company looking to represent tenants and pursue such actions on a commission basis. Accordingly, there is an increasing risk that landlords may find themselves subject to court action under the Regulations.

Link to original judgement: Stuart Russell and Laura Clark v. Samdup Tenzin, Inner House, Court of Session [2015] CSIH 8A

 

“The level of service has always been excellent, with properly experienced solicitors dealing with appropriate cases" Legal 500

Contact BTO

Glasgow

  • 48 St. Vincent Street
  • Glasgow
  • G2 5HS
  • T:+44 (0)141 221 8012
  • F:+44 (0)141 221 7803

Edinburgh

  • One Edinburgh Quay
  • Edinburgh
  • EH3 9QG
  • T:+44 (0)131 222 2939
  • F:+44 (0)131 222 2949

Sectors

Services